What's happening to US?

admin's picture


Sussex Not For Sale! - Mass meeting

Thursday, February 21, 2008
5:00pm - 7:00pm
Arts C133

Did you know that our University management have recently proposed large-scale reforms for Sussex?

Did you know they want to start teaching and researching in the field of International Security, Guantanamo style?

Did you know that they have dodged the democratic process, putting Senate meetings (the academic body) after Council meetings (the highest governing body), counter to the normal procedure?

Did you know that our associate tutors recently got a pay cut?

What do these changes mean for students and staff at the University?

Come and hear about the view of lecturers, students and associate tutors regarding the management's vision for Sussex, how this affects us, and what we can do about it.

Thursday 21 February, 5pm, Arts C133.

Invite people to this event via facebook:
http://sussex.facebook.com/event.php?eid=10153562022


Submitted by admin on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 10:22.

Thursday's meeting

I want to thank you guys for organizing Thursday's meeting. It was very informative and a great success. I'd just like to emphasis again, as I did in the meeting earlier, that we should endeavour to take the high road, for the moment anyway. This is no time to discuss occupations, etc. Rather, we should focus on crafting our message: that Sussex is unique AND IS WORTH SAVING!! I had a few ideas to this end. I received a scholarship from the American Friends of Sussex this year, an alumni group. I'm going to email them about what's going on, and see if they can apply some pressure to the executive. Also, I plan to contact editors at the Independent and the Guardian (where a friend of mine works) about getting a story published ASAP. The pitch for the story could be: what is neoliberal university reform doing to diversity in higher education? If this can happen to Sussex, it can happen anywhere, so there should be a general interest for both papers' readers. Also, I thought that we might use some of the executive's own 'business' speak to argue against the proposed changes. For instance, students aren't just 'consumers'--they are 'stakeholders'. Their involvement in institutions doesn't completely end when they graduate. Also, the changes proposed, even if they bring short term economic relief (which is unlikely, given the lack of thought on behalf of the executive), could result in a long term decline in the university's 'human capital'--that's academics, admin staff, and students. These are any university's primary assets and the proposed changes would like further impoverish the quality level in all these areas. In short, this isn't a viable 'business model'--it's tantamount to institutional suicide.
admin's picture

thanks a lot for the comment

thanks a lot for the comment - I moved it to the forum, because that's the best place for proper debate. http://www.sussexnot4sale.org.uk/node/49